Civil society can include a vast array of organizations, including diaspora associations, migrants’ groups, organizations assisting migrants and many more (as already indicated in Actors and partnerships for migration).
Civil society organizations
Among civil society organizations (CSO) working at the national level, those that work directly with migrants usually have a keen understanding of the situations and issues that migrants are confronted with. Given their interaction with local communities, civil society participation in the implementation of policies through partnerships with governments or intergovernmental organizations can enhance the success rate of these activities, since they are likely to be considered as more integrated with the communities that make up the beneficiaries. These types of programmes can include:
- Providing advice and support to migrants;
- Facilitating social inclusion;
- Informing, advising and supporting migrants to access their rights and comply with national law;
- Advocacy and lobbying to shape policies and programmes;
- Being the interface between migrant communities and the local authorities.
While many CSOs run these types of programmes with the support of donor partners or contributions from their members, they can also be contracted by governments or intergovernmental organizations to deliver specific services to migrants.
For countries of origin, migrant and diaspora associations can be helpful in providing advice to governments on information and programmes to support their nationals living abroad, as well as being a source of skills, knowledge and expertise that can be utilized in initiatives in their home countries. In the destination countries, migrant associations often play the role of being the “voice” of migrants from a specific migrant community, and provide an important point of contact and consultation in the design and implementation of programmes targeted at migrant communities.
However, CSOs face a number of challenges that limit their ability to engage with the authorities effectively, such as access to sustained funding or the ability to develop technical expertise (for example, on legal and policy frameworks) to add value to the policymaking process. At the same time, while the State’s willingness to turn to non-governmental organizations plays a major role, CSOs also face the dilemma of how to position themselves so that they retain their credibility as representatives of migrants while having an influence on the policy agenda (De Feyter and Plaetevoet, 2005).