Causes of family separation

As international migratory movements have become more common, households have become more global, resulting in increasing numbers of transnational families with members living apart across borders. Although migrants may move alone to seize educational or professional opportunities for themselves, sometimes the decision to move away from their families is not their preferred option.

Migrants may prefer to migrate together with their family members and/or be joined by them, but find immigration policies or other circumstances serve as obstacles that lead to separation (Hallock, Soto and Fix, 2018). (Read more on Obstacles to family reunification in this chapter's discussion of changing family migration policies)

In some cases, migrants decide to leave their children behind. Temporary migrants and lower-skilled migrant workers are more often forced to leave their children behind in countries of origin. Skilled migrants and permanent settlers are frequently able to bring their children with them or to have children join them later. However, even for those who have the right to bring family members with them, the decision to do so depends on their available resources, and their family configuration in the country of origin.

Other times, migrants choose to send their children back to the country of origin. This can be because of difficulties in accessing childcare in the country of residence. Such difficulties include a combination of limited public support, especially in the first few years after arrival, the costs of childcare and lack of access to extended family networks, especially for migrants whose salaries are not high (Wong, 2014). The decision to send children back also sometimes happens in times of economic crisis in the country of destination, when high levels of unemployment require parents to work longer hours or be more mobile in search of work (Herrera, 2012).

For information on unaccompanied minors, see Child migration.

Impacts of family separation

Family members may be separated for shorter or longer periods of time. In some cases, this can even amount to decades. Little is known about the differences in costs and opportunities involved in the separation of families across different regions, or the differences between situations where the father rather than the mother migrates, or vice versa (for recent quantitative research on this see, for instance, Parreñas, 2008; Caarls et al., 2018; DeWaard, Nobles and Donato, 2018; Mazzucato and Dito, 2018). However, it is clear that transnationalism and family separation have implications for how families order and negotiate their lives, keep in contact with each other and circulate and exchange care (Baldassar and Merla, 2014). In particular, family separation has been found to have lasting and strongly adverse economic, social, psychological and health-related consequences on the affected families, which can extend even over multiple generations (Spitzer, 2018). In general, family separation:

  • Can bring about economic hardships (Zentgraf and Stoltz Chinchilla, 2012);
  • Disrupts household structure, gender roles and relationships, because infrequent contact can result in difficult and tense relationships between migrants and their family members. Relationships between spouses or parent–child relationships can be difficult to restore or to adjust to after family reunification (Spitzer, 2018; see further information in Child migration);
  • Contributes to reducing family networks, which may not function any more as means of support (Spitzer, 2018);
  • Usually causes immense stress which can translate into health problems;
  • Can give rise to return migration, often irregular, especially in the case of the refugee population (Al-Jablawi, 2018).

For migrants in countries of destination, family separation can also have gendered impacts. For instance, mother can often feel guilt at leaving children behind in line with socio-cultural approaches to motherhood (IOM, 2015; Zentgraf and Stoltz Chinchilla, 2012). Care responsibilities have strong gender implications, especially for women who are mothers at a distance and may also have care duties towards other family members (further details in Gender norms, drivers and discrimination in Gender and migration).

Impacts on families remaining in the country of origin include:

  • Negative impacts on children, including on their health, psychosocial, educational and emotional development. This is especially likely in families where both parents are migrant workers and the children left behind are cared for, on a long-term basis, by caregivers such as grandparents, siblings or other relatives. Issues such as neglect (when they are deprived of food, fed too little, fed the wrong type of food or fed irregularly), acute poverty or stigmatization within the community can increase the risks of unsafe and irregular migration by these children, with a view to being reunified with a parent, or to improve their professional or education outlook.
  • Challenges to caregivers, as they may themselves also be in need of care and face psychological problems due to separation and/or the burden of caregiving. Given that women are often the main caregivers, they can be particularly affected (see example below.)
  • Negative impacts for the elderly and persons with disabilities who are also particularly at risk when relatives caring for them leave and are limited in their ability to care for their own extended families. Again, given that women are often the main caregivers, this risk is particularly high when women migrate (WHO, 2017; Wickramage et al., 2015).
  • Negative impacts on communities in contexts where there are many emigrants leaving relatives behind. The multiplier effect of so many ‘‘absentee’’ family members can have a devastating impact on social cohesion and the psychosocial fabric of a community (Siriwardhana et al., 2015).
  • Difficulty coping with loss when families left behind lose contact with relatives who migrated and have no way to learn about their whereabouts and well-being, especially if relatives migrated through irregular and dangerous channels. This can bring intense stress and difficulty with coping with a loss (Missing migrants project).

Family separation has become a key social feature of countries with large numbers of emigrants whose families remain at home. Increasingly, more governments are recognizing the need to address this issue. Despite being a common phenomenon, the types and degrees of interventions to address family separation vary considerably from country to country.

Example
Policies addressing family separation in countries with large numbers of emigrants

The governments of Moldova, the Philippines and Ecuador, with around 1/10 of the population living abroad, have created policies to address family separation. The Philippines focused on setting up new social assistance and support programmes for family members who have remained in the country. In Moldova, with support from international nongovernmental organizations and intergovernmental bodies (such as the European Union and UNICEF), changes to – and the redesigning of – certain legal frameworks were undertaken to protect and support separated families.

Source

Guendell Rojas, Saab and Taylor, 2013.

Good Practice
Supporting children left behind in China

There were an estimated 245 million internal migrants in 2013 in China. The migration of parents together with their children is a complicated process. For instance, because the household registration system can make it difficult to enrol children in urban schools or take advantage of the public health-care system after migrating, many internal migrants leave their children behind when they move. In 2018, there were an estimated 61 million children left behind, lacking parental care in rural areas of China (UNICEF, 2018).

Different initiatives have been founded to support children left behind. One is the Child Welfare Directors initiative, whereby a grassroots network of selected locals provide assistance to families with children left behind in rural areas. Often times, relatives caring for children whose parents migrated have little time to care for them and/or have little knowledge of how to parent. The Child Welfare Directors are not social workers, but are selected and receive targeted training to provide extra support to these children.

Another initiative is the WeChat e-learning initiative, whereby migrant workers can learn more about parenting and best support their children when they visit home. Migrant workers reported not having had much education and not having learned about parenting before leaving home, in addition to being worried for their children, given that caregivers may not have this knowledge either. Through the largest social media platform in China (WeChat), the Center for Child-Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility (now Centre for Child Rights and Business) and UNICEF China provide a series of tailored multimedia tutorials, including animations, quizzes, cartoon lessons and more on basic skills to deal with common parenting challenges. For instance, the platform hosts basic explanations of common diseases like diarrhoea, skin rash and trachoma, and tips on how to prevent injuries. It also includes substantive content on communication aimed at dealing with the separation between parents and children because of migration (for instance, content on how to say goodbye and on effective long-distance communication). Migrant workers using the platform report they can better parent at a distance, including by giving instructions to caregivers or to their children directly on a regular basis.

Source
Policy Approaches
Supporting family members remaining in the country of origin
  • Create social assistance and support programmes for family members remaining in the country of origin. Consider especially families that may be vulnerable (youth, single-parent women) and more dependent on remittances, which may fluctuate.
  • Provide training and financial assistance to families for a productive use of remittances.
Detention and deportation

Implications of detention and deportation of a family member can have serious economic, physical, psychological and developmental consequences on the other family members, as well as negative impacts on whole communities (Artiga and Lyons, 2018; Langhout et al., 2018). The deportation of a family member can impact the remaining family income or even the ability to afford housing, especially if the deportee is the main provider (American Immigration Council, 2021). Forced separation can have long-term consequences, including after the family has been restored (Brabeck, Lykes and Hershberg, 2011).

There can be limited ability to reclaim parental rights, if a migrant loses custody of children because of detention or deportation. For instance, in the United States of America, parents who are deported or detained may not be able to participate in child custody proceedings, which is especially important if courts require the parents’ attendance (American Immigration Council, 2021). Also, while they may have the right to reunite with their children in another country, this requires considerable coordination between family members, the consulate of the parent’s country, and agencies in the previous country of residence. And proving they can provide a stable and safe environment for their children may be difficult.

The risk of mental health problemssuch as depression, anxiety, and severe psychological distress – for children who are put under prolonged care increases after the detention or deportation of a parent (American Immigration Council, 2021).

Policy Approaches
Preventing and mitigating the implications of detention and deportation for migrants with families
  • Use detention as a measure of last resort in limited cases. Specifically, refrain from detaining migrants with children, when family unity is in the best interests of the child.
  • Explore less intrusive alternatives to detention for the entire family, to allow children and parents to stay together in community-based contexts.
  • Never detain children, in accord with the best interests of the child.
  • Provide legal, social and mental health-related support to family members of migrants who are detained and/or deported.
To Go Further
  • Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), Revised Deliberation No. 5 on Deprivation of Liberty of Migrants, 2018.
  • IOM, IOM Thematic Paper: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention, 2017b. Paper developed to support the consultations preceding the adoption of the Global Compact for Migration.
Key messages
  • Family separation can result from policies and practices restricting family migration, as well as from hardships in the country of destination that lead migrants to leave relatives (mostly children) behind or send them back.
  • Family separation has negative effects on both migrants and families remaining in the country of origin that can extend over generations. This affects mostly children, but also other family members who may also need care, such as the elderly.
  • Separation of families – including as a result of the detention or deportation of a parent or close family member – can have serious economic, physical, psychological and developmental consequences on children, other family members and whole communities.
  • Children and families should not be detained or separated, whenever possible. Families should be reunited wherever possible, if they wish, as per international standards